CC 2088-04-24 Shahar v. Jamgotchian

In this case, we represented the owner of a luxury apartment in Tel Aviv, in a complex lease dispute that began with a claim filed by the tenant for the return of a monetary security deposit and additional claims relating to the termination of the lease agreement.

In response, after a precise examination of the agreement, the option mechanisms, the early-vacation provisions, the securities provided, and the actual conduct of the parties, a statement of defense and a counterclaim were filed against the tenant and against her guarantor, for rent, management fees, ancillary expenses, and additional damages caused by early vacating of the leased premises and the failure to install a replacement tenant who actually took the tenant's place.

The proceeding was managed with an evidentiary and legal focus, relying on explicit provisions of the lease agreement, including the lease and option periods, the obligation to give advance notice, the tenant's liability until an actual replacement tenant was found, and the securities provided to guarantee her obligations. At the same time, concrete heads of damage were presented, including rent differentials, management fees, brokerage fees, and the costs of a break-in and replacement of the locking mechanism.

Managing the proceeding with the right strategy — which included not only defending against the tenant's claim but also applying well-founded legal pressure through a counterclaim against the tenant and her guarantor — ultimately led to a comprehensive settlement agreement, without the need to exhaust the legal proceeding to its end. Under the settlement, payment of NIS 87,000 was agreed — an amount reflecting over 90% of the counterclaim amount — thereby achieving a fast, efficient, and significant financial outcome for the client.

This case illustrates the importance of managing a legal proceeding precisely, deliberately, and strategically from the very first stages. The right choice of defense line, early identification of independent causes of action, correct use of contractual documents and securities, and negotiating from a position of strength — all of these can shorten the duration of the proceeding, reduce risk, and produce a better and faster financial outcome for the client, even without conducting a full evidentiary hearing through to judgment.

Back to Selected Cases